![]() ![]() And, I have some perspective on the choice you face: I also get paid to edit in DaVinci Resolve and am a trained Adobe Premiere editor (though it has been a while, for reasons that will become clear…) My day job is using Final Cut Pro to earn money as a video editor, not writing reviews. Final Cut Pro Struggles with Collaboration.Final Cut Pro’s Stability: It Won’t Let You Down.Final Cut Pro’s Performance (Speed is Good).Final Cut Pro Has Some Sexy (“Advanced”) Features.Final Cut Pro Uses a “Magnetic” Timeline.Final Cut Pro Delivers the Basics of a Professional Editor.What is not great: Less acceptance in the commercial market (less paid work), depth of features (when you are ready for them), and weak collaboration tools. What is great: Useability, the magnetic timeline, price, included titles/transitions/effects, speed, and stability. It may not have as many features as its competitors, but its usability, speed, and stability make it an attractive option for many looking to make a career in video editing.įor this review, I assume you are interested in – or have basic familiarity with – video editing and are considering upgrading to a professional-level editor. The combination of these two factors makes it a natural choice for beginning editors.īut it is also good for professional editors. ![]() What sets Final Cut Pro apart is that it is relatively easy to learn, and is much cheaper than Avid or Premiere Pro. ![]() For the most part, all of these programs are equal. Final Cut Pro is a professional video editing program, comparable to Avid Media Composer, DaVinci Resolve, and Adobe Premiere Pro. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |